As per the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) banks under the guidance of state-level bankers committees (SLBCs) had declared several districts in the country as 100 per cent financially included, but in actual financial inclusion has not been extended to all the districts.
RBI report stated that most of the accounts which have been opened as part of the financial inclusion drive are still inoperative because of various reasons such as distance from the branch, illiteracy, lack of interest and non-availability of passbooks. The RBI added, “There is a need for SLBC/DCCs to actively step up the awareness with regard to no-frills accounts as this continues to be poor in many districts”.
The RBI remarked, “Although the SLBCs have declared several districts as 100 per cent financially included, the actual financial inclusion has not been to that extent”. While in the RBI’s Annual Policy Statement for the year 2007-08 it was announced that an assessment of the progress will be done of the districts where 100 per cent financial inclusion would be taken up by independent external agencies. Therefore, studies were carried out in 26 districts in the states of Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Karnataka, Orissa, Punjab, Rajasthan and
According to records in Rajsamand district, Rajasthan, 92.27 per cent households in villages have a bank account. Though 52.39 per cent people had no transactions in their bank accounts due to distance of the branch (79.64 per cent), illiteracy (6.60 per cent) and not being interested (10.04 per cent). Whereas in towns, 98 per cent households had a bank account and 86.94 per cent carried out transactions in the accounts. As per records in towns, those who did not carry out transactions pointed toward non-availability of passbook (75.47 per cent) as the major reason. While in Srikakulam district in Andhra Pradesh, about 71 per cent of all those wishing for of having banking facilities had been provided with accounts. But there are no reports of providing KCC, OD (over draft) or GCC (general credit card) facilities to the no-frill account holders.
2 comments:
Aagney - I'd be quite curious to hear more. What's fascinating here is two things. First, the fact that half of no frills account holders in some situations do not use the account. The data puts a pin in the balloon of the notion of access to finance being a black/white definition of "have/don't have" an account. Quality of access is key.
And that points at the 2nd thing I found fascinating. That 76% of people cited distance to the bank as the main constraint. This suggests branchless banking via correspondents has tremendous potential - a la Kenya, Brazil and Philippines were thousands of merchants, post offices, etc handle cash for banks and extend their network in a low-cost fashion. Of course, there are still some restrictions in the RBI regulations for correspondents.
What RBI report is this from? I had a look through the RBI website and did not easily find it. Many thanks, Aagney, if you would post the name of the report or even better a link!
Mark Pickens
CGAP
www.cgap.org
Sir,
As regards extending banking services through Branchless Banking via correspondents,RBI is allowing certain entities to become correspondents and in the State of Andhra Pradesh the Govt benefits are being disbursed through bank accounts by Banks by positioning correspondents in each village.
Post a Comment